• a) Describe your current position and efforts related to Broader Impacts
• b) What is your main goal for incorporating and using the ARIS toolkit in your work?
• c) Include a fun photo of yourself

• Partner Introductions (30 min)
• Project Overview (15 Min)
  Jamboard: What is your main goal for using the ARIS Toolkit?
• ARIS Toolkit Overview (checklist, wizard, & rubric) – A high level overview of the scope and sequence, and how these tools might be used to support BI work (30 minutes)
• Introduction to the data collection strategy and methods for this project (15 minutes)

1. BI Wizard “Plan Elements” Web Quest: Use the webquest worksheet to “find and learn about” the essential pieces of a BI plan.
2. BI Wizard Review: Use the BI case study to test run the “Wizard” portion of the website. Print your draft plan to discuss at the meeting.
3. Be prepared to discuss the top three things that you learned in the plan elements section; two questions you still have; and one thing you will use in your next consultation or workshop.
4. Complete the Institutional Needs Assessment survey.

Please upload your 1) completed survey, 2) draft BI plan summary, and 3) "3-2-1 reflection" to this Google Drive folder by November 14th. Don't forget to add your institution name to each doc's filename.

• We will discuss the plans you have generated in the homework. How did you feel about the plan elements section? (1 hour)
• Setting up data collection plan Part 1 – Overview of what is action research? (3o minutes)

1. Review the BI Plan Rubric.
2. Review the Rubric Tutorial.
3. Chose a recent BI plan you worked on, or one of the 4 provided plans (Example 1, Example 2, Example 3, Example 4), and run it through the Rubric. Print your results to discuss at the meeting.
4. Please upload 1) your responses to the Connect, Extend, Challenge, Apply questions (see right) and 2) your rubric output to this Google Drive folder by December 16th.

• We will discuss the rubric and its usability. (1 hour)
  a. Connect: How are the ideas and information in the Rubric connect to what you already know about reviewing NSF BI proposals?
  b. Extend: What new ideas extended or broadened your thinking in a new direction?
  c. Challenge: What still seems challenging or confusing? What questions or wonderings do you still have?
  d. Apply: What one or two ways can these ideas about the rubric can be applied in your work?
• Setting up data collection plan Part 2 – Review data collection instruments. (30 minutes)

1. Develop your action plan: How will you use the toolkit in your context? What are your initial thoughts on data collection? Please write a 1-2 page summary of your plans. You can also use this research plan slide outline for guidance.
2. Please upload your plan to this Google Drive folder by 1/19, so we can discuss it at our next meeting.

1. Respond to prompts: What does an effective workshop on BI look like? What are the components? What types of researchers attend? How do you differentiate learning to make it a positive experience for them?
2. Upload a sample agenda of a workshop you have done or would like to do with the toolkit.
3. Please upload your responses to the questions and workshop agenda to this Google Drive folder.
4. Begin data collection, if not already started.

1. Watch Drew Pearl's JCES Intro Video. (4 minutes)
2. Scan/read one or more of the Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship articles listed at the bottom of this page.
3. Post an update to your project (a single slide) by March 17th, to this Google Drive directory. This slide should provide bullets on your progress and current thinking about your article.
4. Review workshop agenda.
5. Review new and improved BI Wizard and come with comments/suggestions for the team!

• Agenda TBD, but primary focus will be on reviewing the Toolkit in detail. Decide what parts of the kit work and what parts do not. Cohort members should come prepared to make suggestions for tweaking the toolkit for publication.
• Continue discussion on how best to use the toolkit in trainings and consultations
• Review data collection progress

1. Respond to prompts: What does an effective consultation on BI look like? What are the components? What types of researchers do you serve?
2. Upload a sample scenario of a consultation you have done or would like to do with the toolkit. Please upload to this Google Drive folder.

Also, please take a look at the four videos in Module 3 of the new ARIS Certification previous course. (For those of you who participated in the ARIS Summit workshop that previewed modules 1 & 2, this module was added after.) These four video profiles will hopefully be a fun way to think about the types of researchers we support in consultations.

• We will review what parts of the toolkit lend themselves best to a consultation. Discuss ideas from each cohort member in small groups. Synthesize ideas for sharing.
• Preview the new training videos and/or Institutional training module

What is your story? – A one-page (can be single spaced) free write. Post to Google drive folder by June 16th so everyone can review.

Your one-page free-write should be related to your team's case history - that is, your team's story of using the Toolkit. This can include what kind of data you are collecting, and might hint at what your argument about using the Toolkit might be.

Teams will be paired in breakout rooms to read and respond to their partner’s story. What sounds exciting/interesting; what questions do you have?

Come back to the group and report one thing from the feedback breakouts and a brief update of each project and how data collection is going.

Post a sentence that captures the “argument” of your chapter. Please review the What's Your Argument document for guidance. Think about ways to make your case study interesting to your audience (what will be your “hook”). Post by July 21 so everyone can review.

Teams will be paired in breakout rooms to read and respond to their partner’s story. What sounds exciting/interesting; what questions do you have?

Come back to the group and report one thing from the feedback breakouts and a brief update of each project and how data collection is going.

Review the different chapter formats used in the Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship. Decide which one of these would be best suited for your case study. See example articles on our project webpage to review the journal formats/types. Bring your ideas for and concerns about the format for discussion.

Group discussion on formats and discussion on preparation for in person September workshop.

Goal: leave with a complete draft of your case study.

• Cohort members present initial thoughts/findings/case study outline to a cohort team member. (10 minutes each, and 10 minutes for discussion in break outs)
• Group discussion (1 hour)

1. Reflection prep for Sharathon
2. Provide suggestions for external paper reviewers

1. Submit first draft of article!!!
2. Also, what 3 things are you really looking for feedback on?

• Acknowledge our work together and answer any remaining questions/concerns
• Guest speaker TBA

• The beginning of the end - Regroup and review where are we with our articles
• Review drafts with Sharon Zuber and prepare for external review

• Cohort members present initial thoughts/findings/case study outline to a cohort team member (20 minutes / 10 minutes for discussions in break outs)
• Group discussion (1 hour)

• Cohort teams review external reviewer comments and discuss revisions
• Buddy Breakouts - Cohort members present article to a cohort team member (20 minutes / 10 minutes for questions in break outs)
• Group discussion 1 hour

• Discuss final articles in Buddy Breakouts - Cohort members present final article to a cohort team member (20 minutes / 10 minutes for questions in break outs)
• Group discussion 1 hour

1. Final revised manuscripts!!! (if not already submitted)
2. Submit (brief) final report/reflection to Rutgers